Heres a telling statistic: one child dies and 50 sustain brain
injuries every day from bicycle accidents. In about one out of four
cases, the child doesnt have the simple protection provided
by a $20 riding helmet.
Researchers say a public health campaign to get kids to wear helmets
could greatly reduce head trauma from bicycle-related injuries.
Interventions are often launched when a risk to public health is perceived,
but my question is, how do officials decide what disease or danger
to target?
Some issues have gotten swift and decisive attention. When four children
died from eating contaminated hamburgers in 1993, major changes were
made in the inspection of meat and Congressional hearings were held
on the subject.
The same thing happened in 1997 after 48 children were killed by airbags.
The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration ordered
modifications and launched a massive educational campaign to let parents
know about the danger.
As a commentary in the journal Pediatrics (July 1999) points
out, in the case of bicycle helmets, theres been a collective
yawn from the public health community.
I see most youngsters in the Thousand Oaks area wearing bike helmets,
but studies show this isnt true in most places. One survey put
the helmet usage rate among children five to 14 years old at about
25 percent nationwide, according to the article in Pediatrics.
Wearing a helmet is certainly a safety precaution we should all support.
It would result in more lives saved and more injuries prevented than
practically any other intervention I can think of in the health and
safety field.
Please also remember, if your child had had
an accident and hit his or her helmet, you MUST replace the helmet.
They are only designed to protect only once. |